Відео

Looks like something broke its neck

That was a beautiful , seamless transition into the sponsor's plug and a simple return back to the content. Well done!

Sadly it will be bought up by one of the energy firms and it won’t make any free or cheap energy for the public.

I’m old enough to remember them saying with Hydro-electric power they’ll be producing so much they will not be charging you for using it. Reality is the energy companies will charge the highest price they can to get profit for their shareholders regardless of the production costs.

And why not use a hub in the rim?

Capacitor battery with this idea🗿also on research

Now were gonna have to worry about bugs being spies

I'd never heard of these, so of course I wanted to know how they work. Having to wait until half way through the video for that was a bit annoying.

Fascinating concept. The two challenges that I see are dynamic effects of wave motion on the rotating joint. None of the simulations are looking at 5m waves inputs. Second is the challenge of laying lines further out to sea. Admittedly this is a smaller challenge

This is not a real product. It’s the CCP trying to trick the westerners!

Have you ever tested a old fashioned childs toy, the simple pinwheel ? Several years ago a company was actually marketing & selling them in several countries, as a more efficient wind turbine as compared to the conventional savoui bladed wind turbine. They had a youtube video showing actual testing being performed. What I thought was truly impressive, was the fact that the wind not only pushed the front face of the blades, but that a vortexing air column was formed, exiting the blades in a centralized location & thus also pulling or sucking the entire air flow from the backside of the wind turbine. You should research this, as I believe the company was possibly bought out, as to shelve the turbine, because it was to efficient. There were other features to the overall design of the system, such as having the generator on the ground for ease of maintenance & the turbine was ultra-quiet. 😮

What about fresh water from déshumidification ?

That drill on high torque setting almost broke my wrist many times during construction rough ins

Works much like a helicopter, and if any rotor fails, you have no wings to glide down safely with. At least a helicopter has some mass to sustain inertia on the rotor for a partially controlled decent. I think I'll stick with fixed wing planes. Replacing the screws for water vessels however is an interesting idea.

I consider myself a fairly intelligent person but I'm sitting here listening to this guy explain all these things and gotta tell ya I feels like an idjit. I'm like some hillybilly caveman listening to Dr. Oppenheimer explain nuclear physics. I don't know what this guy said but wow he said it so well!

Hahhahha sorry but completly wrong - game controllers are NOT used to control a virgina class submarine 😂😂😂😂😂 Jesus where you get your research from

If a design cannot attract venture capital, it is neither the future nor has future. Ziroth should confirm a design attract venture capital before saying the design is the future.

Junk

Too expensive (subsea install) for getting small amount of power

Can it take pfos out? That may be a bigger problem than salt

We have states like California and Nevada that are suffering from water shortage. Why haven’t we investigated how to desalinate water? California has an entire ocean next to it.

Was done years ago (decades ago) in Australia. This is the commercialized device. ua-cam.com/video/mPzFfqaXkJU/v-deo.html

This would be perfect for the Special Operation community.

So the secret was electrolytes. Just like with Brawndo.

Bullshit, they been singing this song for decades, but no progress.

As soon as I heard "Sea levels rising" I knew it was propaganda. Never do they think of land mass sinking(like in Venice, Italy)

This isn’t new

Lmao, save us from what ourselves . Save us from making new tec that poisons our environment . # 1 No tec will ever save you , the tec is the reason you need to be saved from the tec . The creator made a perfect existence, and we were fooled by outside sources . Now maybe if we followed the proper ways with tec it would all be fine but look at the world . Cancer is at it worse and all from greed homeless people with ten and the rest with nothing . Evil , think the devil is not real . Magic is a deception. miricals are real now go look in a mirror and outside at all that was created for us to awe at and give thanks for . Bless all and know all was created for all by all to all . Our creator is made from everything, and everything made the creator .

Tough test, accelerating while going uphill. If the bike manufacturer is big enough to sue, their name, address will be of interest to DeWalt, Makita, Milwaukee, Craftsman, etc. The lawsuit may never leave China.

Plain common sense. If we don't prepare for the certainty of change, catastrophe ensures.

The blades rotate the same as helicopter blades, so couldn't they just use the same setup that a helicopter uses to tilt its blades, since that system has already been time tested to be reliable? They should incorporate the helicopter cyclical system into their system for the blade tilt. 😁👍

It's a total joke. 95% of the wind blows right past the blades. You have 10-12 mph hour wind. Clear your mind and forget what you thought was correct. I started fresh and ended up with a totally new design that produces lots of current at low wind speed. I crossed a Piper Cub, a jet turbine, and a wind surfer. You have to know how to sail a sail boat.

what is price of turbine ?

Ha ha, decarbonise with lumps of carbon. 😂

~1.4kwh/kg on oneplus's new phone the ace 3 pro. with a good knowledge of consumer electronics industry...demand and supply determine these things, and I don't think anyone is aware of what these companies are cooking, these tech are already on the market, silicon fused electrodes ...etc.

I guess you could do that if you want to brake your drill lol

People acting like CATL is random lab in the basement that managed to write article by luck. Lmao. They don't realize who they discrediting. "Wake me up when it's commercially available." they don't know the only one that has resources to make these batteries commercial is CATL. lol

Solve the problem? 👎 Make a big wall?👍

The original video was uploaded 16 years ago to this day, has at least over 20 million views, A screenshot of the video is the profile picture of the account it was posted to, and it’s the only singular upload on that account as well.

they should be installed along freeways for energy harvest from passing vehicles.

Our battery is twice as strong as anything you’ve ever seen! Also you’re not allowed to see it, but take my word for it!

As a wind energy researcher, I like certain features of this idea, but it seems there is one major aspect common to most 2-blade rotors, either missing or not mentioned - so I won't mention that aspect either (sorry). But anyway, I'm seeing quite a few common symptoms in wannabe, always-in-the-future, wind energy promotions that go nowhere. First, that logo representing swirling wind, is a consistent hallmark of a future-failed wind energy concept - just sayin' - they all use it. Next, despite promoting this design, with all that funding, they don't show us a working prototype of that design, at any scale, but instead. at 6:48, have a version mounted on a small tower that happens to be standing in shallow water - why not just do it on land at that point? Why not build a prototype of their actual floating design? Hmmmm... 72 m/s = 161 mph. OK so they first say their new, untested, "barrel" device will withstand winds of 161 miles per hour, while yet still producing power. Now this is a bold statement to make in wind energy, or in marine engineering for that matter. 161 miles per hour is a category 5 hurricane - as bad as it gets. And this turbine is said to keep on producing power in a catego0ry 5 hurricane. But later in the video, we're told they've given up on this "barrel" design because they decided it might be challenged in big waves. I guess they just figured out that a 161 mph wind would entail big waves. It's OK, don't worry, still later in the video they go back to promoting the old "barrel" design. It is just so symptomatic to make absurd claims like this in the field of wannabe wind energy, populated by people who have never had mother nature blow their turbines to smithereens. Sure, your untested idea will magically withstand winds that no previous marine structure could. All the beginners think like that. Mission-creep: They keep talking about reducing the wake effect of upwind units on downwind units in floating windfarms, as a (the?) main advantage, but still can't show us a single actual unit even floating, let alone operating. But forget seeing even a small model working - now it's all about the untested wake "theory", and how many more units they can pack into a windfarm - uh-huh, sure. Apparently, they have no real proof of this wake factor either. Typical. And with all that funding, they can't even show you a small-scale model that works - something that could be built in a garage, for a few hundred bucks. So at 8:23, they suddenly throw away everything said up until that point, and basically admit the design they have been talking about would have problems with waves, and they are now instead considering a completely different type of base, using four vertical floating interconnected cylinders, of which they briefly show someone else's model in a tank, saying "the barrel design" (that has been the subject of the entire video thusfar), "is more from an older iteration" - huh? OK so with no further explanation of how, why, or what this new iteration they are suddenly now talking about even is? How does this entirely new, yet unshown, base, fit into a design that consisted mostly of the old base they had been showing us? The old base was 90% of the invention. If they have a new design, why is this video about the old design? OK so the rest of the video goes back to showing the old (now obsolete?) design. Mission-creep again: Suddenly, with no explanation of how or why, they diverge into extreme trendy-buzzword excuse-land, and their next new goal is "3-printing" and "biodiversity", showing a hunk of concrete with holes in it, to attract fish, as their new breakthrough? Yeah, sure, just change the subject to a different topic, and hope potential investors won't notice. Well, some investors are subject to emotion-based "reasoning" too. Then at 8:50, they show truck testing of what appears to be a single 1.5 meter rotor, while talking of a (future, of course) project involving ten 12 kW, 6-meter rotors. Like they're really gonna do that, when they can't build even a tiny single working model of their supposed (and ever-changing) design. Like they even really could do that. I think it might be too much for them. Prescient how, at 11:24 they admit it might just "evolve" into a regular old wind turbine on a pole - in other words ignore everything you've just heard up until that point. :)

at 25 mph you'll have about half an hour of riding time with that battery

Look up cavitation steam energy by CES

Ocean water provides hydrogen on demand with energetic cavitation bubble impact by @EirexTech with comparable explanation by Prof. Marc Ramsey, Vanderbilt University titled “Energetic Cavitation Impact” on UA-cam to discover overunity cavitation unlimited power.

UAP or UFO is interesting.

Free desalinated ocean or purified polluted pond water is provided by @EirexTech for energetic cavitation water bubble impacts providing lowest cost hydrogen gaseous fueled electricity or transportation zero pollution fuel sources.

The battery clearly says 54v

I saw a video mentioning that normal light waves can break the molecular bonds of water, thus allowing it to desalinate at a reduced energy profile than heating up and boiling it. I was wondering, could both of these cutting-edge technological breakthroughs complement each other bringing down production costs even further?

That 775 motor heats up like fun.